Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1998 (3) TMI 704 - HC - Indian Laws

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Statutory modification clause extends arbitration to the new Act, and bona fide civil-court time can be excluded for limitation. A pre-existing arbitration clause referring to statutory modification or re-enactment was read as embracing the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, so ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Statutory modification clause extends arbitration to the new Act, and bona fide civil-court time can be excluded for limitation.

                            A pre-existing arbitration clause referring to statutory modification or re-enactment was read as embracing the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, so pending proceedings could be governed by the new Act under section 85 where that matched the parties' intention. The court rejected the view that a fresh post-commencement agreement was required. It also treated receipt of a signed copy of the award as the operative event for limitation under sections 31(5), 33 and 34, and allowed exclusion of time spent bona fide pursuing the matter in Civil Court. The respondent was therefore left free to pursue post-award remedies under the 1996 Act.




                            Issues: (i) Whether arbitral proceedings commenced under the Arbitration Act, 1940 and pending when the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 came into force were governed by the old Act or the new Act where the arbitration clause referred to statutory modification or re-enactment; (ii) Whether, on the facts, the respondent could still take recourse under sections 33 and 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and whether time spent in prosecuting the matter before the Civil Court was liable to be excluded.

                            Issue (i): Whether arbitral proceedings commenced under the Arbitration Act, 1940 and pending when the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 came into force were governed by the old Act or the new Act where the arbitration clause referred to statutory modification or re-enactment.

                            Analysis: Section 85 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 saves the applicability of the repealed enactment to pending arbitral proceedings, unless the parties otherwise agree. The expression "unless otherwise agreed by the parties" was construed as referring to the parties' intention on the procedural regime and not to the time when the agreement was made. A clause providing that the arbitration would be governed by the Arbitration Act, 1940 or any statutory modification or re-enactment thereof was held to cover the new Act as well, because the agreement contemplated the law for the time being in force and any statutory change affecting the arbitral procedure. The trial Court's view that a fresh post-commencement agreement was necessary was held to be incorrect.

                            Conclusion: The new Act applied to the pending arbitration proceedings, and the trial Court's contrary finding could not be sustained.

                            Issue (ii): Whether, on the facts, the respondent could still take recourse under sections 33 and 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and whether time spent in prosecuting the matter before the Civil Court was liable to be excluded.

                            Analysis: The award had been received by the parties before the filing of objections in the Civil Court, and sections 31(5), 33 and 34 make the delivery and receipt of a signed copy of the award the operative event for limitation. Since the respondent had been prosecuting the matter bona fide in the Civil Court under the belief that the old Act applied, it was held appropriate to protect its remedy by excluding the intervening period while computing limitation. The decision preserved the respondent's statutory right to seek correction, interpretation or setting aside of the award under the new Act.

                            Conclusion: The respondent was left free to pursue remedies under sections 33 and 34, with exclusion of the relevant period for limitation purposes.

                            Final Conclusion: The revision succeeded, the impugned order was set aside, and the arbitration proceedings pending before the trial Court were brought to an end while preserving the parties' statutory remedies under the new Act.

                            Ratio Decidendi: Where a pre-existing arbitration agreement contemplates statutory modification or re-enactment, the saving clause in section 85 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 permits the new Act to govern pending proceedings if that reflects the parties' intention, and limitation for post-award remedies runs from receipt of the signed award copy.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found