Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Scheme of Amalgamation Approved by Tribunal for Simplifying Group Structure</h1> The National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai, sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation between two Transferor Companies and a Transferee Company under relevant ... Scheme of amalgamation - Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 - sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 - HELD THAT:- Since all the requisite statutory compliances have been fulfilled, the Company Scheme Petition Nos. 227 and 219 are made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (d) and Company Scheme Petition No.229 is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) - The Petitioner Companies are directed to file a copy of this order along with a copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation with the concerned Registrar of Companies, electronically, along with e-Form INC-28, in addition to physical copy, within 30 days from the date of receipt of the order by the Registry. The Petitioner Companies to pay costs of ₹ 25,000/- each to the Regional Director, Western Region, Mumbai and the Petitioner Companies in Company Scheme Petition No. 227 and 219 to pay cost of ₹ 25,000/- each to Official Liquidator, High Court, Bombay.Costs to be paid within four weeks from the date of the receipt of the order. Issues:1. Sanction of the tribunal under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 and sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 for a Scheme of Amalgamation.2. Compliance with statutory requirements and reports by the Official Liquidator and Regional Director.3. Fairness, reasonableness, and compliance with the law of the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation.Analysis:The judgment before the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai, involved the sanctioning of a Scheme of Amalgamation between two Transferor Companies and a Transferee Company under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 and sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The purpose of the merger was to simplify the Group structure, minimize administrative costs, and enhance management efficiency. The Petitioner Companies had approved the Scheme through Board Resolutions. The Petitions were filed in accordance with the Tribunal's order, and the companies had complied with all requirements and filed necessary Affidavits of compliance.The Official Liquidator and the Regional Director had submitted reports regarding the Scheme. The Official Liquidator recommended the dissolution of the Transferor Companies without winding up. The Regional Director's report highlighted certain concerns, including tax implications, compliance with accounting standards, and the provision of the Chairman's Report. The Petitioner Companies assured compliance with all tax implications and undertook to address the issues raised by the Regional Director.The Tribunal found the Scheme to be fair, reasonable, and in compliance with the law, not contrary to public interest. As all statutory compliances were met, the Company Scheme Petitions were made absolute. The Petitioner Companies were directed to file the order and the Scheme with the Registrar of Companies and the Superintendent of Stamps within specified timelines. Additionally, costs were imposed on the Petitioner Companies and directed authorities to act on the certified order and Scheme. Finally, liberty was granted to any aggrieved party to approach the Tribunal.In conclusion, the judgment addressed the legal aspects of the proposed Amalgamation Scheme, ensuring compliance with statutory requirements and addressing concerns raised by the Official Liquidator and the Regional Director. The Tribunal's decision was based on the fairness, reasonableness, and legality of the Scheme, ultimately granting approval and providing directions for implementation and compliance.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found