Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal Upholds Insolvency Application Against Corporate Debtor: Focus on Debt Default and Resolution Efforts</h1> <h3>Mr. Hemanth Meka Rao Versus L&T Finance Ltd. & Anr.  </h3> The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's admission of the application by 'L&T Finance Limited' against 'M/s. Meka Dredging Company Private ... Maintainability of application - Initiation of CIRP - Corporate debtor - Failure to pay the debt and having defaulted to pay the amount - Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - HELD THAT:- In view of the fact that there was a default on the part of the ‘Corporate Debtor’ and the application filed by the ‘Financial Creditor’- ‘L&T Finance Limited’ was in order, the Adjudicating Authority having admitted the application, we find no ground to interfere with the said impugned order. Settlement with the ‘Financial Creditor’- ‘L&T Finance Limited’ - HELD THAT:- If Settlement has been made, on the basis of such settlement, we cannot grant any relief. It is informed that in the meantime, the order of liquidation has been passed on 20th September, 2018 against which the Appellant has also moved an appeal before this Appellate Tribunal and is pending consideration. While we do not grant any relief to the Appellant, we make it clear that this order will not come in the way of the parties to settle the matter, if they do not want liquidation and may move before the appropriate forum for appropriate relief - Appeal disposed off. Issues:1. Failure to pay debt by 'M/s. Meka Dredging Company Private Limited' leading to initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.2. Settlement with one Financial Creditor but failure to settle with another Financial Creditor, 'ARCIL'.3. Revocation of settlement agreement with 'ARCIL' and its impact on the insolvency resolution process.4. Adjudicating Authority's admission of the application by 'L&T Finance Limited' and the subsequent order of liquidation.Analysis:1. The case involved the failure of 'M/s. Meka Dredging Company Private Limited' to pay its debt, prompting 'L&T Finance Limited' to file an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Adjudicating Authority admitted the application due to the default in payment by the Corporate Debtor.2. 'L&T Finance Limited' claimed a principal amount of Rs. 19,60,00,000/- along with interest totaling Rs. 22,74,42,271/- as of 9th November 2016. Subsequently, the Appellant expressed a desire to settle with 'L&T Finance Limited', which was successfully done, leading to the receipt of a no due certificate. However, no settlement was reached with 'ARCIL', another Financial Creditor.3. The Appellant's failure to settle with 'ARCIL' raised questions about a prior settlement agreement that was allegedly revoked due to non-payment by the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal refrained from delving into the specifics of the settlement revocation, focusing instead on the default by the Corporate Debtor and the validity of the application by 'L&T Finance Limited'.4. Despite the settlement with 'L&T Finance Limited', the Tribunal noted that the order of liquidation had already been passed, with the Appellant appealing the decision. While no relief was granted to the Appellant in this instance, the Tribunal emphasized that the order should not hinder the parties from seeking further resolution through appropriate channels to avoid liquidation.In conclusion, the Tribunal disposed of the appeal and Interlocutory Application with the mentioned observations, allowing the parties to pursue further settlement options without hindrance from the current order.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found