Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Interpretation of 'regular assessment' under s. 214(1) of I.T. Act, 1961 for interest on excess advance tax

        Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City IV Versus Carona Sahu Company Limited

        Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City IV Versus Carona Sahu Company Limited - [1984] 146 ITR 452, 38 CTR 219, 16 TAXMANN 32 Issues Involved:
        1. Meaning of 'regular assessment' under s. 214(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961.
        2. Assessee's entitlement to interest under s. 214 beyond the date of the first regular assessment.
        3. The applicability of interest provisions in the context of appellate or revisional orders.

        Summary:

        1. Meaning of 'regular assessment' under s. 214(1):
        The court addressed whether 'regular assessment' in s. 214(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961, referred to the first order of regular assessment passed by the ITO or the last operative order of regular assessment at any given point of time passed as a result of appellate or revisional proceedings. The court concluded that 'regular assessment' means the first order of regular assessment passed by the ITO. Consequently, the Central Government is liable to pay interest on the excess amount of advance tax paid by the assessee from 1st April following the financial year to the date of such first order of regular assessment.

        2. Assessee's entitlement to interest under s. 214 beyond the date of the first regular assessment:
        The court examined whether interest under s. 214 is allowable beyond the date of the regular assessment and up to the date of the ITO's order giving effect to the AAC's order. The court noted that it was precluded from answering this question due to the Supreme Court's judgment in CIT v. V. Damodaran [1980] 121 ITR 572. However, the court discussed the matter and concluded that the words 'regular assessment' in s. 214 mean the first order of regular assessment, not the last operative order. Therefore, interest is not payable beyond the date of the first regular assessment.

        3. Applicability of interest provisions in the context of appellate or revisional orders:
        The court considered various judgments and the statutory provisions, including ss. 214, 215, and 244, to determine the applicability of interest provisions in the context of appellate or revisional orders. It concluded that 'regular assessment' refers to the first order of regular assessment. The court also addressed the interpretation of sub-s. (2) of s. 214, which provides that interest is payable only up to the date on which the refund was made, and found that it does not extend the period of interest payment beyond the first regular assessment.

        Final Judgment:
        The court held that the words 'regular assessment' in s. 214(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961, mean the first order of regular assessment passed by the ITO. Consequently, the Central Government is liable to pay interest on the excess amount of advance tax paid by the assessee from 1st April following the financial year to the date of such first order of regular assessment. The question referred at the instance of the Revenue was answered in the negative, i.e., in favor of the Revenue. The assessee was ordered to pay the costs of the reference to the Revenue.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found