Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Jurisdiction based on registered office location; debtor found ineligible as financial creditor; importance of time value of money.</h1> <h3>Ludhiana Scrips Pvt. Ltd. Versus. K.C. Land & Finance Ltd.,</h3> The National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh held that the petition falls under its jurisdiction due to the debtor's registered office location. Ludhiana ... Admissibility of petition - Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - scope of Financial Creditor - Section 7 of IBC - territorial jurisdiction - HELD THAT:- The petitioner has failed to show that it is covered within the definition of the term “financial creditor” eligible to maintain a petition under Section 7 of the Code. We say for the reason that the amount disbursed to the corporate debtor does not in any way show that the same was against the consideration for time value of money and not falling within any of the clauses (a to (i) of sub-section 8 of Section 5 of the Code. There is no document relied upon by the petitioner with this petition about the terms of original disbursement of amount made to the respondent-corporate debtor so as to bring the case within the four corners of the definition of the term ‘financial debt’ as given in sub-section (8) of Section 5 of the Code - Perusal of the demand notice dated 16.03.2018 Annexure5 does not indicate that the amount was borrowed by the respondent on payment of interest or for consideration for the time value and the transaction is not shown to be covered under any of the sub clauses (b) to (i) of Section 5(8) of the Code. The petitioner can be considered as a financial creditor as defined in the Code and the application for initiating the insolvency resolution process cannot be maintained - Petition dismissed. Issues:1. Jurisdiction of the National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh.2. Eligibility of the petitioner as a financial creditor under Section 7 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016.3. Interpretation of the term 'financial creditor' and 'financial debt' under the Code.4. Validity of the compromise agreement and its impact on the insolvency resolution process.Jurisdiction of the National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh:The judgment establishes that the petition filed by Ludhiana Scrips Pvt. Ltd. falls within the territorial jurisdiction of the National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh as the corporate debtor's registered office is located in the State of Punjab.Eligibility of the petitioner as a financial creditor:The Tribunal analyzed whether Ludhiana Scrips Pvt. Ltd. qualifies as a financial creditor under Section 7 of the Code. It was observed that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the disbursed amount was against the consideration for the time value of money, a crucial element for being classified as a financial creditor.Interpretation of the term 'financial creditor' and 'financial debt' under the Code:The judgment delves into the definitions provided under the Code for 'financial creditor' and 'financial debt.' It highlights that the amount disbursed must be against the consideration for the time value of money to qualify as a financial debt, encompassing various financial transactions specified in Section 5(8) of the Code.Validity of the compromise agreement and its impact on the insolvency resolution process:The Tribunal scrutinized the compromise agreement entered into by the parties, emphasizing that the petitioner did not provide evidence regarding the terms of the original disbursement to establish the case as falling within the definition of a financial debt. The judgment concluded that the petitioner could not be considered a financial creditor under the Code, leading to the rejection of the insolvency resolution process application.This comprehensive analysis of the judgment from the National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh, elucidates the key issues surrounding jurisdiction, eligibility as a financial creditor, interpretation of relevant terms under the Code, and the impact of the compromise agreement on the insolvency resolution process.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found