Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the deemed disqualification under Rule 25 of the Delhi Co-operative Societies Rules, 1973 and the availability of the statutory mechanism had to be examined before directing allotment of the plot, and whether the writ petition required reconsideration by the High Court.
Analysis: Rule 25(2) creates a deeming disqualification and operates as a legal fiction, which must be given full effect according to its purpose and consequences. The effect of that provision, along with the question whether the respondent had to pursue the statutory remedy available under the Act and Rules, had not been examined by the High Court. In those circumstances, the matter could not be finally decided on the basis adopted by the High Court and required a fresh hearing.
Conclusion: The writ petition was required to be heard afresh by the High Court in the light of the applicable legal provisions, and the matter was remitted for reconsideration.