Delhi High Court admits appeal, sets question of law for further proceedings. Justices Ahmed and Easwar preside. The Delhi High Court admitted the appeal and formulated the question of law in the case, which will be listed for further proceedings. Justices Badar ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Delhi High Court admits appeal, sets question of law for further proceedings. Justices Ahmed and Easwar preside.
The Delhi High Court admitted the appeal and formulated the question of law in the case, which will be listed for further proceedings. Justices Badar Durrez Ahmed and R.V. Easwar presided over the matter, with representation from Mr. Ajay Vohra, Ms. Kavita Jha, and Mr. Amit Sachdeva for the Respondent.
The Delhi High Court's judgment in 2013 (2) TMI 886 states that the appeal has been admitted and the question of law has been formulated. The case will be listed in due course. Justices Badar Durrez Ahmed and R.V. Easwar were presiding over the case. The Respondent was represented by Mr. Ajay Vohra, Ms. Kavita Jha, and Mr. Amit Sachdeva.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.