Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether imported hard disk drives assembled in array form remained entitled to exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. despite classification dispute within Heading 847170 and the Revenue's plea for residuary classification.
Analysis: The goods were accepted as hard disk drives. The notification covered goods falling under Heading 847170, and no bifurcation was made in the notification between the relevant sub-headings. Mere import of hard disk drives in array form did not take the goods outside the scope of the exemption, since the notification did not exclude the sub-classification relied on by the Revenue. On that footing, the classification adopted by the lower appellate authority was held to be correct and the exemption was held available.
Conclusion: The imported goods were held entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 6/2006-C.E., and the Revenue appeal failed.