Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal rules in favor of Assessee, partially allowing appeal on disallowance of expenses.

        M/s. Ranadey Micronutrients Pvt. Ltd. Versus ACIT, Circle-6, Pune And DCIT, Circle-5, Pune Versus M/s. Ranadey Micronutrients Pvt. Ltd.,

        M/s. Ranadey Micronutrients Pvt. Ltd. Versus ACIT, Circle-6, Pune And DCIT, Circle-5, Pune Versus M/s. Ranadey Micronutrients Pvt. Ltd., - TMI Issues:
        Cross appeals filed by Assessee and Revenue against CIT(A) order for A.Y. 2010-11.

        Analysis:
        1. Disallowance of Commission and Disallowance u/s.14A:
        - Assessee, a private company in fertilizer business, filed return declaring income of Rs. 1,16,41,403.
        - AO made additions including Rs. 27,79,911 for disallowance u/s.14A and Rs. 41,33,000 for commission u/s.40A(2)(b)(iv) r.w.s. 36(1)(ii).
        - AO strictly followed Rule 8D(2) for disallowance.
        - CIT(A) upheld disallowance of Rs. 27,79,911 but allowed commission claim based on board resolution and tax payment by recipients.
        - Revenue appealed against relief granted by CIT(A) on commission payment.

        2. Revenue Appeal - Commission Payment Issue:
        - Revenue contended that abnormal increase in commission payments compared to preceding year was unjustified.
        - AO disallowed Rs. 4,130 of the total commission paid.
        - CIT(A) dismissed AO's conclusions, citing active involvement of directors and proportionate services rendered.
        - CIT(A) held that tax paid by recipients at highest rate justified the commission payments.
        - Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing Revenue's appeal.

        3. Assessee Appeal - Disallowance u/s.14A:
        - Assessee claimed exempt income of Rs. 17,78,000 and disallowed Rs. 84,967 u/s.14A.
        - AO disallowed Rs. 27,29,202 citing mixed finances and made additions.
        - CIT(A) confirmed AO's decision based on proximity to exempt income.
        - Assessee appealed against CIT(A)'s order.

        4. Assessee Appeal - Disallowance u/s.14A Analysis:
        - Assessee argued disallowance exceeding exempt income was legally unsustainable.
        - Assessee had interest-free funds adequate for investments.
        - Tribunal reversed CIT(A)'s decision, deleting disallowance of Rs. 27,29,202.
        - Partially allowed disallowance of Rs. 50,909 under section 36(1)(iii) read with Rule 8D(2).

        In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed Revenue's appeal on commission payment issue and partly allowed Assessee's appeal by deleting disallowance of Rs. 27,29,202 u/s.14A and partly confirming disallowance of Rs. 50,909. The judgment was pronounced on October 18, 2017.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found