Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>ITAT dismisses Revenue's rectification applications on section 80P(2)(e) addition under Income Tax Act</h1> The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's Miscellaneous Applications seeking rectification in the consolidated order regarding the dismissal of the appeal on the ... Rectification u/s 254 - allowability of assessee’s claim of deduction u/s 80P(2)(e) - HELD THAT:- Issue decided in the light of the decision of the Hon'ble High Court in the case of the assessee itself on the impugned issue, after noting the fact that the CIT(A) himself had verified the component of rent received by the assessee eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(e) as per the directions of the Hon'ble High Court. I.T.A.T. had also taken note of the fact that in the earlier years this issue had been sent back to the A.O. for verification and adjudication in the light of the findings of the Hon'ble High Court. In the impugned year, since it was found that the verification had already been done by the CIT(A) himself which was in accordance with the findings of the Hon'ble High Court, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed on this count. The plea of the Revenue, therefore, that the issue needed to be restored back to the A.O. in the light of the decision of the I.T.A.T. in the earlier years, therefore, is based on incorrect appreciation of facts. We hold that there is clearly no error in the order of the I.T.A.T. and both the Miscellaneous Applications filed by the Revenue are, therefore, dismissed. Issues:Rectification sought by Revenue in consolidated order regarding dismissal of appeal on addition made u/s 80P(2)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.Analysis:1. Issue of Rectification by Revenue:The Revenue filed Miscellaneous Applications seeking rectification in the consolidated order passed by ITAT regarding the dismissal of the appeal on the addition made under section 80P(2)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue contended that the issue was covered in its favor based on previous cases where similar appeals were dismissed, indicating a favorable stance towards the Revenue.2. Contentions of the Parties:During the hearing, the Revenue reiterated its contentions made in the Miscellaneous Application, emphasizing that the issue was decided in favor of the assessee erroneously. On the other hand, the counsel for the assessee argued that the ITAT had considered the issue in the preceding years and decided in favor of the assessee after taking into account the judgments of the Hon'ble High Court.3. Decision of the ITAT:After careful consideration of the arguments and reviewing the impugned orders, the ITAT found no merit in the Revenue's Miscellaneous Application. The ITAT observed that the issue of the deduction under section 80P(2)(e) was decided in light of the Hon'ble High Court's decision, which was verified by the CIT(A). The ITAT noted that in previous years, the issue was referred back to the Assessing Officer for verification, but in the impugned year, the CIT(A) had already verified the relevant details as per the High Court's directions.4. Conclusion:The ITAT held that there was no error in its order, as the issue had been adequately adjudicated by the CIT(A) based on the High Court's decision. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's Miscellaneous Applications, concluding that there was no requirement to restore the matter to the Assessing Officer. Therefore, both the Miscellaneous Applications filed by the Revenue were dismissed by the ITAT.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found