Valid assignment of financial debt and proved default support financial creditor status and initiation of insolvency proceedings.

A legally valid assignment of financial debt, supported by a deed of assignment and consideration, is described as sufficient to confer financial creditor status under the insolvency framework. The text notes rejection of objections based on RBI guidelines, exclusion of the SBLC from the transfer, alleged contractual breach, and the argument that only NPAs can be assigned, because the transfer of the loan itself was not invalidated and borrower consent was not required. It further states that default was treated as established through the statement of dues and supporting certificate, that the application was complete, and that no disciplinary proceeding was pending against the proposed resolution professional, leading to admission and initiation of CIRP.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the debt was legally assigned by the original lender to the applicant so as to make it a financial creditor under the insolvency law; (ii) whether default was established and the application was complete so as to warrant admission under the insolvency resolution framework.

Issue (i): whether the debt was legally assigned by the original lender to the applicant so as to make it a financial creditor under the insolvency law.

Analysis: The assignment was supported by a deed of assignment and consideration had been paid. The objections based on RBI guidelines, non-assignment of the SBLC, alleged breach of contractual terms, and the contention that only NPAs could be assigned were rejected. It was held that RBI directions did not prohibit assignment of a standard asset to an asset reconstruction company in the relevant legal setting, and that the validity of the lender's representations concerning NPA status was a matter between the assignor and assignee. The contractual documents also permitted assignment by the lender without borrower consent, and the exclusion of SBLC from the assignment did not invalidate the transfer of the loan itself.

Conclusion: The assignment was held to be valid, and the applicant was held to be a financial creditor entitled to proceed under the insolvency code.

Issue (ii): whether default was established and the application was complete so as to warrant admission under the insolvency resolution framework.

Analysis: The objection that the default amount was unsupported was rejected because the statement of dues was backed by the requisite certificate under the Bankers Books Evidence Act. The discrepancy in outstanding figures was explained as a clerical rectification by the assignor, and the tribunal accepted the computation of dues. The record also showed that the application was otherwise complete and that no disciplinary proceeding was pending against the proposed resolution professional.

Conclusion: Default was held proved and the application was found complete, satisfying the statutory conditions for admission.

Final Conclusion: The insolvency petition was admitted, moratorium was imposed, and the corporate insolvency resolution process was set in motion against the corporate debtor.

Ratio Decidendi: For admission under section 7, a legally valid assignment of financial debt coupled with proved default and a complete application is sufficient to confer financial creditor status and justify initiation of corporate insolvency resolution proceedings.

---