TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal grants relief by allowing Cenvat credit on transportation costs</h1> <h3>M/s ARL Infratech Ltd. Versus CCE & ST, Jaipur -I</h3> The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, granting them relief by setting aside the order disallowing Cenvat credit on outward transportation services. ... CENVAT Credit - input services - outward transportation - cost of transportation was included in the FOR - disputed period is June, 2009 to May 2010 - HELD THAT:- The identical issue has come up in the assessee – appellant’s own case for the subsequent period in M/S ARL INFRATECH LIMITED VERSUS CCE, JAIPUR [2017 (8) TMI 1542 - CESTAT, DELHI] where it was held that appellant is entitled to avail Cenvat credit on outward goods transportation agency services - credit allowed - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. Issues:- Cenvat credit on outward transportation servicesAnalysis:The case involves an appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. 96/2017 dated 7.6.2017 for the disputed period of June 2009 to May 2010. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing asbestos cement sheets and pipes falling under Chapter 68 & 70 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, claimed Cenvat credit on outward transportation where the cost was included in the FOR. The department disallowed the credit, leading to the appeal.Upon hearing both parties and examining the records, it was noted that a similar issue had been addressed in the appellant's own case for a subsequent period in M/s ARL Infratech Ltd. Vs. CCE, Jaipur. Referring to the case of Birla Corporation Ltd. Vs. CCE, Jaipur-II and Madras Cements Ltd. Vs. Additional Commr., Bangalore, the Tribunal held that since the goods were supplied on FOR basis to the buyer's place, including the value of transportation in the assessable value of the goods, the appellant was entitled to avail Cenvat credit on outward goods transportation agency services. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, following the precedent set in earlier cases.In conclusion, the Tribunal, by adhering to its previous decision, found no justification to uphold the impugned order disallowing the Cenvat credit on outward transportation services. Therefore, the order was set aside, and the appellant's appeal was allowed, granting them the relief sought.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
