Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the restrictions under the tobacco control statute could be applied to duty free shops at international airports and whether the impugned provisions could be struck down or read down on the footing that such sales were not exports.
Analysis: The Court held that sales from duty free shops at international airports are treated as exports and that such shops operate beyond the customs frontiers of India. It relied on the statutory definition of export, the customs law definition of export and exporter, and the foreign trade policy, which permits export-oriented units to operate retail outlets at international airports. The Court also relied on binding precedents holding that transactions at duty free shops beyond immigration clearance are outside India for relevant legal purposes. The challenge to those precedents as per incuriam was rejected because a High Court cannot declare a Supreme Court decision per incuriam. On that basis, the Court concluded that the exemption for export under the tobacco control statute validly applied to duty free shops.
Conclusion: The challenge failed and the impugned provisions were not struck down or read down as sought.