TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court rules in favor of revenue on employee participation & staff transit house expenditure</h1> <h3>Purolator India Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Income-tax</h3> Purolator India Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Income-tax - TMI Issues involved:The issues involved in the judgment are:1. Interpretation of employee participation expenditure in a hotel or restaurant u/s 37(2A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. Disallowance of expenditure on rent of staff transit houses u/s 37(4) and 37(5) of the Income-tax Act.Interpretation of employee participation expenditure:The High Court considered whether the Tribunal erred in holding that the portion of expenditure related to employee participation in providing food, drinks, etc., to customers in a hotel or restaurant was not covered by the exception provided in Explanation 2 to section 37(2A) of the Income-tax Act. The Court noted that the question had to be answered in the negative, in favor of the revenue and against the assessee, based on the decision of the Supreme Court in CIT v. Patel Bros. & Co. Ltd. [1995] 215 ITR 1651. This decision clarified the treatment of such expenditures under the relevant provisions of the Act.Disallowance of expenditure on staff transit houses:Regarding the disallowance of expenditure on rent of staff transit houses or on the repairs thereof under sections 37(4) and 37(5) of the Income-tax Act, the High Court observed that the question had to be answered in the affirmative, in favor of the revenue and against the assessee. This conclusion was drawn in light of the Supreme Court decision in Britannia Industries Ltd. v. CIT [2005] 278 ITR 5462, which highlighted the specific provisions under sections 30 to 36 of the Act that govern the allowability of such expenditures. Therefore, the Court upheld the disallowance of these expenses as per the relevant statutory provisions.The High Court disposed of the reference accordingly, providing clarity on the interpretation and treatment of the specified expenditures under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
TaxTMI 