Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported goods described as faceted glass beads or chatons were classifiable under Tariff Item 7018 10 20 as beads, or under Tariff Item 7018 10 90, and whether such classification attracted countervailing duty.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that earlier decisions had consistently held chatons to be a of glass beads, even if they were not pierced, and had classified them under the bead entry. It relied on prior Tribunal rulings and the Supreme Court's affirmation of the view taken in VMB Impex. On that basis, the Tribunal found no reason to depart from the settled classification adopted by the adjudicating authority.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classified under Tariff Item 7018 10 20 as beads and not under Tariff Item 7018 10 90; the Revenue's challenge failed, and the classification did not attract countervailing duty.