Tribunal rules AO erred in invoking wrong section for assessment, deems order void, allows assessee's appeals.

The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer erred in invoking Section 147 instead of Section 153C for assessment following a search and seizure action. The assessment order under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 was deemed void, and the assessee's appeals were allowed. The Tribunal's decision on jurisdiction rendered moot the issues of treating proceeds from share transfers as unexplained money and assessment under Section 69C. The orders passed by the AO for both assessment years were set aside, with the decision pronounced on March 16, 2018.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of notice issued under Section 148.
2. Treatment of proceeds received on transfer of shares as unexplained money.
3. Assessment under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of Notice Issued Under Section 148:
The primary legal grievance of the assessee concerns the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 147 and the framing of the assessment under Section 143(3) read with Section 147, despite the case falling under the purview of Section 153C. The assessee argued that once proceedings under Section 153C were initiated, the issuance of notice under Section 148 was invalid. The assessee contended that Section 153C, which deals with assessments related to search actions, specifically excludes the operation of Section 147. The Tribunal found that documents belonging to the assessee were discovered during a search and seizure action at the premises of a company director, leading to the issuance of a notice under Section 153C. However, no assessment under Section 153C was completed, and a notice under Section 148 was subsequently issued. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO) erred in invoking the provisions of Section 147 when the case should have been assessed under Section 153C. The Tribunal cited several judicial pronouncements, including the ITAT Delhi Bench in Rajat Shubra Chatterji vs. ACIT and ITAT Amritsar Bench in Arun Kumar Kapoor, which supported the view that Section 153C assessments exclude the application of Sections 147 and 148. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the assessment order framed under Section 143(3) read with Section 147, deeming it without jurisdiction and void ab initio.

2. Treatment of Proceeds Received on Transfer of Shares as Unexplained Money:
The assessee challenged the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]'s decision to treat the proceeds from the transfer of shares of Transmission Securities Ltd. as unexplained money. The Tribunal did not provide a detailed analysis on this issue, as the primary focus was on the jurisdictional validity of the notice issued under Section 148 and the subsequent assessment under Section 147. Since the Tribunal set aside the assessment order on jurisdictional grounds, this issue was rendered moot.

3. Assessment Under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act:
The assessee also contested the CIT(A)'s decision to assess a certain amount under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act. Similar to the issue of unexplained money, the Tribunal did not delve into a detailed analysis on this matter. The focus remained on the jurisdictional issue, and with the setting aside of the assessment order under Section 143(3) read with Section 147, this issue was also rendered moot.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal concluded that the AO was not justified in invoking the provisions of Section 147 when the case fell under the purview of Section 153C due to the search and seizure action. The assessment order framed under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 was set aside as being without jurisdiction. Consequently, the appeals of the assessee were allowed, and the orders passed by the AO for both assessment years were set aside. The Tribunal's decision was pronounced in the open court on March 16, 2018.

---