Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (2) TMI 1858 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal nullifies assessment orders for procedural lapses & lack of application of mind by tax authority. The Tribunal annulled the assessment orders due to procedural lapses and lack of proper application of mind by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Jt. ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal nullifies assessment orders for procedural lapses & lack of application of mind by tax authority.

                          The Tribunal annulled the assessment orders due to procedural lapses and lack of proper application of mind by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Jt. CIT). Finding that the approval was granted mechanically without examining assessment records, the Tribunal held that the assessments had an incurable defect. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's cross-objections and appeals, dismissing the Department's appeals as infructuous.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Validity of approval granted under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Application of mind by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Jt. CIT) in granting approval.
                          3. Examination of assessment records by the Jt. CIT.
                          4. Compliance with statutory obligations under Section 153D.
                          5. Annulment of assessment orders due to improper approval.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          Issue 1: Validity of approval granted under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act, 1961

                          The core issue raised by the assessee was the validity of the approval granted under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee challenged the assessment proceedings on the grounds that the approval granted by the Jt. CIT was not in accordance with the law. The Tribunal noted that the approval was granted on the same day the draft assessment orders were received, suggesting a lack of proper deliberation.

                          Issue 2: Application of mind by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Jt. CIT) in granting approval

                          The Tribunal found that the Jt. CIT granted approval to the draft assessment orders without proper application of mind. The approval was granted on 31st March 2013, the same day the draft assessment orders were received. The Tribunal observed that the Jt. CIT was in Udaipur while the records were in Jodhpur, making it physically impossible for the Jt. CIT to have examined the records thoroughly. This indicated that the approval was granted in a mechanical manner.

                          Issue 3: Examination of assessment records by the Jt. CIT

                          The Tribunal emphasized that the Jt. CIT did not examine the assessment records before granting approval. The records were in Jodhpur, and the approval was sent from Udaipur, reinforcing the conclusion that the Jt. CIT did not review the records. The Tribunal highlighted that the approval was granted at 6:56 a.m., before office hours, further questioning the thoroughness of the review process.

                          Issue 4: Compliance with statutory obligations under Section 153D

                          The Tribunal referred to various judicial precedents, including the case of Sahara India (Firm) vs. CIT, which stressed that the approval under Section 153D must be granted after thorough examination of the material on record. The Tribunal concluded that the Jt. CIT failed to comply with the statutory obligation of granting approval after due application of mind, as mandated by Section 153D.

                          Issue 5: Annulment of assessment orders due to improper approval

                          Given the procedural lapses and the lack of proper application of mind by the Jt. CIT, the Tribunal annulled the assessment orders. The Tribunal held that the assessments suffered from an incurable defect due to the improper approval process. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's cross-objections and appeals, and dismissed the Department's appeals as infructuous.

                          Conclusion:

                          The Tribunal concluded that the Jt. CIT granted approval to the draft assessment orders in a mechanical manner without proper application of mind. The approval was granted on the same day the draft orders were received, and the Jt. CIT did not examine the assessment records. This failure to comply with the statutory obligations under Section 153D led to the annulment of the assessment orders. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's cross-objections and appeals, and dismissed the Department's appeals as infructuous.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found