Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court rules absorbent cotton wool I.P. taxable at 6% as pharmaceutical preparation</h1> The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, determining that absorbent cotton wool I.P. should be taxed at 6% under Entry No. 56 of the notification dated ... - Issues Involved:1. Validity of notices issued to the petitioner.2. Determination of the applicable tax rate for absorbent cotton wool I.P.3. Applicability of the judgment in Vishwas Surgical Industries case.4. Interpretation of relevant tax notifications and entries.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Validity of Notices Issued to the Petitioner:The petitioner challenged the notices (Annexures 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 10) issued by the Commercial Taxes Department. The court observed that the notices were issued based on the judgment by the Rajasthan Sales Tax Tribunal in the Vishwas Surgical Industries case. The court found that directing the petitioner to appear before the authorities in response to these notices would be futile, as the authorities were bound by the Tribunal's decision. Hence, the court overruled the respondents' preliminary objection that the petitioner should first approach the authorities.2. Determination of the Applicable Tax Rate for Absorbent Cotton Wool I.P.:The primary contention was whether absorbent cotton wool I.P. was covered under Item No. 16 of the notification dated 27.6.1990, which would subject it to a tax rate of 4%. Item No. 16 included 'cotton of all kinds (indigenous or imported), whether ginned or unginned, baled, pressed or otherwise including cotton waste.' The court noted that the petitioner was initially collecting tax at 4% based on an order by the Additional Commissioner, Commercial Taxes. However, the Tribunal's judgment in the Vishwas Surgical Industries case, which classified absorbent cotton wool as a pharmaceutical preparation taxable at 6%, prompted the issuance of the contested notices.3. Applicability of the Judgment in Vishwas Surgical Industries Case:The Tribunal in the Vishwas Surgical Industries case determined that absorbent cotton wool, commonly known as surgical cotton, was a pharmaceutical preparation and should be taxed at 6%. The court acknowledged that the Tribunal's decision conflicted with the Additional Commissioner's earlier ruling. The court noted that the Tribunal's decision was based on the classification of absorbent cotton wool as a pharmaceutical product due to its preparation process, which involves cleaning, bleaching, and other treatments.4. Interpretation of Relevant Tax Notifications and Entries:The court analyzed the relevant entries in the tax notifications. Item No. 16 of the notification dated 27.6.1990 covered all kinds of cotton, including cotton waste, but without the terms 'manufactured or unmanufactured' that were present in the earlier notification dated 8.3.1988. The court also considered Entry No. 56, which covered 'medicines, drugs, and all kinds of pharmaceutical preparations.' The court concluded that absorbent cotton wool I.P., being a highly purified and chemically treated product, fell under Entry No. 56 as a pharmaceutical preparation.The court referenced various judgments, including those from the Allahabad High Court and the Madras High Court, which supported the classification of absorbent cotton wool as a pharmaceutical product rather than raw cotton. The court agreed with the Tribunal's view that the product underwent a manufacturing process, making it a pharmaceutical product taxable at 6%.Conclusion:The court concluded that absorbent cotton wool I.P. or surgical cotton is covered by Entry No. 56 of the notification dated 27.6.1990 and should be taxed at 6%, not 4%. The writ petition was allowed in part, affirming the Tribunal's decision and directing that the petitioner's tax liability be assessed at the rate of 6% under Entry No. 56.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found