Tribunal Remits ALP Determination for Software Services, Grants Assessee Hearing Opportunity

The Tribunal remitted the determination of arm's length price (ALP) and consequential adjustments for software development services and interest on receivables back to the Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer, directing compliance with its guidelines and granting the assessee a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment for Provision of Software Development Services.
2. Working Capital Adjustment.
3. Inclusion of Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd. in Comparables.
4. Transfer Pricing Adjustment on Interest for Delayed Realization of Receivables.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment for Provision of Software Development Services:
The assessee, an Indian subsidiary of Pitney Bowes Software Inc., USA, reported an international transaction of Rs. 109,01,74,781/- for software development services. The TPO adjusted the arm’s length price (ALP) using the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM), leading to an addition of Rs. 10,45,71,656/- after DRP's directions. The Tribunal noted that the assessee's method (TNMM) was not disputed. However, the issues of working capital adjustment and inclusion of Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd. in comparables were raised.

2. Working Capital Adjustment:
The Tribunal observed that in the preceding year, the working capital adjustment was granted following the Tribunal's directions, which were upheld by the High Court. Since the facts were similar, the Tribunal directed the A.O./TPO to grant the working capital adjustment, remitting the matter for necessary actions.

3. Inclusion of Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd. in Comparables:
The TPO included the Industrial cluster segment of Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd. in comparables, which the assessee contested due to functional differences and high turnover. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the TPO’s computation, particularly the exclusion of unallocated expenses and improper allocation of depreciation and amortization. The Tribunal held that without proper allocation keys, inclusion of such a company vitiates comparability, directing its exclusion from the comparables list.

4. Transfer Pricing Adjustment on Interest for Delayed Realization of Receivables:
The TPO noted delayed realization of invoices from AEs, computing an adjustment of Rs. 11,57,791/- for interest on receivables, considering a 30-day grace period. The Tribunal referred to the Explanation to section 92B, inserted retrospectively from 1.4.2002, which includes any debt arising during the course of business as an international transaction. The Tribunal upheld that delayed realization of receivables constitutes an international transaction requiring ALP determination. However, it remitted the matter to the A.O./TPO to verify the correct realization period, as the assessee claimed no delays beyond 30 days from AEs.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal remitted the determination of ALP and consequential adjustments for both the software development services and interest on receivables back to the A.O./TPO, directing them to follow the Tribunal's guidelines and allow the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.

---