Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether losses incurred by the assessee in businesses outside Travancore could be deducted in computing its income from business in Travancore under the Travancore Income-tax Act.
Analysis: The relevant provisions were construed to hold that the proviso to section 32(1), corresponding to section 24(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, applies only where there is a set-off between different heads of income and not where business income is computed under a single head. Section 18(2)(c), corresponding to section 14(2)(c), was treated as an exemption provision for income arising outside Travancore and not as a prohibition against taking account of business losses outside Travancore when computing business profits. The Court preferred the view that all branches of a banking business form one business for computation under the business head, and that losses from branches outside the taxable area cannot be ignored merely because the corresponding profits would be exempt in Travancore.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to deduct the loss of Rs. 79,275 incurred outside Travancore from the profits made in Travancore.
Ratio Decidendi: In computing business income under the relevant business-head provision, losses of the same business carried on outside the taxable State are deductible unless the statute expressly excludes them; an exemption from tax on foreign or external profits does not by itself bar deduction of corresponding business losses.