Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purpose of section 23A, the sum of Rs. 50,000 paid under a compromise of pending litigation could be deducted in computing the commercial profits and the availability of profits for distribution.
Analysis: Section 23A applies only where the statutory conditions are satisfied and the question of smallness of profits must be judged on commercial profits, not merely on assessable income. A genuine payment actually made out of the company's funds may be taken into account in ascertaining commercial profits if it has a business connection. On the facts found, the payment was made pursuant to a bona fide compromise in protracted litigation and was treated as an actual and genuine outgoing. The finding that it was made to get rid of a disturbing element supported its business character, and the mere fact that the amount was not allowable in income-tax assessment did not prevent its deduction for section 23A purposes.
Conclusion: The sum of Rs. 50,000 was deductible in computing the profits for section 23A, and the answer was in favour of the assessee.