Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2011 (2) TMI 1554 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal allows appeal on warranty provision & interest income under Section 80-IB The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee concerning the disallowance of provision for warranty, holding that the provision was an ascertained ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal allows appeal on warranty provision & interest income under Section 80-IB

                          The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee concerning the disallowance of provision for warranty, holding that the provision was an ascertained liability and should not be disallowed. Regarding the exclusion of interest income for deduction under Section 80-IB, the Tribunal ruled that the interest income from LC Margin Money Deposits should be treated as business income but remanded the issue back to the AO for verification. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with specific directions for reassessment of interest income.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Disallowance of provision for warranty amounting to Rs. 2,26,05,903.
                          2. Exclusion of interest income of Rs. 25,83,813 from the profits of eligible units for computing deduction under Section 80-IB of the Income Tax Act.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Disallowance of Provision for Warranty:

                          The assessee, a company engaged in the manufacture and trading of computer systems and components, had debited Rs. 8,24,29,136 in the Profit & Loss (P&L) account as provision for warranty. However, the actual expenditure incurred during the year was Rs. 4,92,32,936. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the unexpended portion of the provision for warranty amounting to Rs. 2,26,05,903, which was upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)].

                          The Tribunal noted that the assessee created the provision for warranty based on the estimation of expenditure likely to be incurred on past sales, using historical data and industry trends. This method was consistent and not ad hoc. The Tribunal referenced the Supreme Court's decision in Rotork Controls India Pvt. Ltd., which validated the provision for warranty based on past experience as a scientific and appropriate method.

                          Additionally, the Tribunal cited its own previous decision in the assessee's case for the immediately preceding year, where it had ruled in favor of the assessee, recognizing the provision for warranty as an ascertained liability rather than a contingent one.

                          In conclusion, the Tribunal held that the disallowance of the provision for warranty should be deleted, and the appeal on this ground was allowed.

                          2. Exclusion of Interest Income for Deduction under Section 80-IB:

                          The AO had excluded Rs. 25,83,813 from the profits derived by the Pondicherry unit for computing the deduction under Section 80-IB of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(A) upheld this exclusion, referencing the Supreme Court's decision in Pandian Chemicals.

                          The assessee argued that the interest income should be bifurcated into:
                          - LC Margin Money Deposits with Bank: Rs. 15,53,186.
                          - Fixed Deposits with Bank: Rs. 10,30,627.

                          The assessee conceded that the interest on fixed deposits, being surplus money, was not eligible for deduction under Section 80-IB. However, it contended that the interest earned from deposits made for opening letters of credit (LC) was directly linked to the business activity and should be eligible for deduction.

                          The Tribunal referred to the Delhi High Court's decision in CIT v. Eltek SGS Pvt. Ltd., which distinguished between the language of Section 80HH and Section 80-IB, noting that the latter requires profits and gains from "any business of the undertaking," allowing for a broader interpretation.

                          The Tribunal also cited its own decision in Bajaj Healthcare P. Ltd., where it allowed interest on deposits made for availing bank facilities, following the Delhi High Court's rationale.

                          Given these precedents, the Tribunal ruled that the interest income from LC Margin Money Deposits should be treated as business income with a direct nexus to the business activity. However, since the specific break-up of interest was not available, the issue was remanded back to the AO for verification and appropriate allowance of the deduction.

                          In conclusion, the appeal on this ground was allowed for statistical purposes.

                          Final Judgment:

                          The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, with specific directions for the AO to reassess the interest income for deduction under Section 80-IB. The order was pronounced on February 25, 2011, in Bangalore.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found