Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the income from the Ulster Road property settled under the trust deed was includible in the assessee's total income under section 16(1)(c) of the Indian Income-tax Act as income from a revocable transfer, and whether proviso 3 excluded the settlement from that clause.
Analysis: The settlement was irrevocable in form, but proviso 1 to section 16(1)(c) applied where the deed contained a provision for retransfer of income or assets to the settlor or for reassumption of power over them. The clauses relied upon by the Revenue did not amount to a present retransfer or reassumption in respect of the settlor's residence, the maintenance arrangement for the wife and children, or the contingent payment of income to the settlor after the wife's death. Proviso 3 was held to govern not only transfers revocable in fact but also transfers deemed revocable under proviso 1. Since the settlement was not revocable during the lifetime of the beneficiary wife and the settlor retained no direct or indirect benefit in the income settled for her life, the conditions of proviso 3 were satisfied.
Conclusion: The income settled on the wife during her lifetime was not assessable as the assessee's income under section 16(1)(c).