Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was required to deduct tax at source under section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the value of by-products retained by the millers under the milling arrangement.
Analysis: The assessee was a State agency procuring paddy and getting it milled under contracts that provided for payment of milling charges, while the millers retained the by-products. The facts were held to be identical to earlier decisions of the Tribunal in the assessee's own case and in connected matters, and no contrary material or different factual position was shown to warrant departure from the consistent view already taken. On the contractual terms, the by-products and residuals were treated as belonging to the millers, and no separate payment was made by the assessee for the milling services beyond the stipulated charges.
Conclusion: The assessee was not required to deduct tax at source under section 194C on the value of the by-products.