1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court dismisses Revenue's appeal on disallowance under Section 14A for proposed but unrealized dividend income.</h1> The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the ITAT and CIT(A) order canceling a disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act for Rs. ... Disallowance u/s 14A - Held that:- The assessee for AY 2010-11 had filed its return and thereafter revised it. AO was of the opinion that the assessee had shown dividend income to the tune of βΉ 142.5 crores which was exempt from taxation. Upon his determination, a sum of βΉ 4,90,88,000/- was added under Section 14A as the expenditure involved exempt income although the CIT(A) and the ITAT found that as a matter of fact, the exempt income of βΉ 142.5 crores had not been obtained and that it was only a proposed dividend. Having regard to these findings, the question of application of Section 14A of the 1961 Act could not have arisen. There is no substantial question of law. The High Court dismissed the appeal by the Revenue against the order of the ITAT and CIT(A) regarding the cancellation of disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act for an amount of Rs. 4,90,88,000. The court found that the exempt income of Rs. 142.5 crores was only a proposed dividend and not obtained, hence Section 14A did not apply.