TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the levy imposed on laden railway wagons entering the municipal limits was a "toll" within Section 128(1)(vii) of the U. P. Municipalities Act, 1916 and Item 59 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India.
Analysis: The expression "toll" was construed in light of established legal usage and legislative history. The competing views were whether a toll required a specific quid pro quo directly referable to the vehicles charged, or whether the levy could be supported by the general municipal advantages and amenities afforded within the municipal area. The reasoning accepted that tolls are not confined to toll traverse and toll thorough in the narrow highway sense, that statutory tolls may be imposed for general public advantage, and that the legislature was competent to authorise a toll on vehicles entering municipal limits even without a specific service directly usable by each wagon. The levy on laden railway wagons was therefore held to fall within the statutory and constitutional meaning of "toll".
Conclusion: The levy was held to be a valid toll and the challenge to its imposition failed.
Final Conclusion: The appellant was not entitled to relief against the municipal demand, and the appeal was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: A municipal levy authorised by statute as a toll may be valid where it is supported by the general public advantage and amenities provided by the authority, and it is not necessary that the specific vehicle or conveyance charged must directly utilise a particular service in order for the levy to qualify as a toll.
TaxTMI 
