Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal rules on tax assessment reopening, favors assessee on non-business expenditure & interest expense</h1> <h3>M/s. Gigaplex Estate Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Known as B. Raheja Builders Pvt. Ltd. Versus DCIT, OSD II, Mumbai</h3> The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment under Section 147/148, citing failure to disclose material facts. However, it ruled in favor of the ... Reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 - income escaped assessment - non-business expenditure - disallowance of interest expense - reducing such interest from the value of 'Inventories' - Held that:- there was failure on the part of assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts for completion of assessment during the assessment proceedings. The case laws relied upon by the assessee are not applicable to the facts of the case as the necessary agreements qua joint venture, relinquishing the interest in the said land were not furnished before the AO in the course of assessment proceedings and there is a failure on the part of the assessee to disclose the material facts during the course of assessment and hence in our opinion the re-opening is validly done - Decided against the assessee Non-business expenditure - Held that:- When the transaction has already been treated as genuine then there is no ground to treat the same as sham transaction in further reassessment order. Moreover, the case of the assessee based on factual position which has duly been explained by the Hon’ble ITAT while passing the order in the assessee’s own case [2017 (11) TMI 719 - ITAT MUMBAI] - Decided in favor of assessee. Issues Involved:1. Validity of reopening of assessment under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act.2. Treatment of amounts payable to Om Metals Ltd. and Wellwisher Construction & Finance Pvt. Ltd. as non-business expenditure.3. Disallowance of interest expense attributable to the payments made to Om Metals Ltd. and Wellwisher Construction & Finance Pvt. Ltd.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:ISSUE NO 1: Validity of Reopening of Assessment under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax ActThe assessee challenged the reopening of the assessment under Section 148 of the Act. The representative argued that this issue had already been decided in favor of the assessee in previous assessment years (2006-07, 2007-08, and 2008-09). However, the Tribunal referred to its earlier decision, which stated that the reopening was valid as the assessee failed to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the assessment. Specifically, the assessee did not provide copies of agreements with Om Metals Ltd. and Wellwisher Construction & Finance Pvt. Ltd. during the original assessment proceedings, which led to the conclusion that there was a failure to disclose material facts. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment under Section 147.ISSUE NO 2: Treatment of Amounts Payable to Om Metals Ltd. and Wellwisher Construction & Finance Pvt. Ltd. as Non-Business ExpenditureThe assessee contested the CIT(A)'s confirmation of the AO's decision to treat the amounts payable to Om Metals Ltd. and Wellwisher Construction & Finance Pvt. Ltd. as non-business expenditure. The Tribunal referred to its previous ruling, where it was established that the transaction between the assessee and the two JV partners was genuine. The land was initially allotted to the assessee and the JV partners by MIDC, and the JV partners later relinquished their interest in favor of the assessee upon payment. This transaction was accounted for in the assessee's books, and the AO initially accepted it during scrutiny proceedings. The Tribunal noted that the revenue treated the transaction as genuine in the hands of the JV partners, and therefore, it could not be considered non-genuine in the hands of the assessee. Thus, the Tribunal decided this issue in favor of the assessee.ISSUE NO 3: Disallowance of Interest Expense Attributable to Payments Made to Om Metals Ltd. and Wellwisher Construction & Finance Pvt. Ltd.The assessee also challenged the disallowance of interest expense related to the payments made to Om Metals Ltd. and Wellwisher Construction & Finance Pvt. Ltd. The Tribunal, referring to its earlier decision, held that since the transaction was genuine, any interest incurred on the borrowed money for these payments should be allowed. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the disallowance of interest expense, deciding this issue in favor of the assessee.Conclusion:The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment under Section 147/148 but ruled in favor of the assessee on the issues of treating the amounts payable as non-business expenditure and disallowance of interest expense. Consequently, the appeals filed by the assessee were partly allowed.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found