Social welfare levy upheld despite deferred benefits under a phased insurance scheme.

Chapter V-A of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, imposing special employer contribution during the transitory period, was upheld as a social welfare levy within the legislative field of social security and labour welfare under Entries 23 and 24 of List III. The Court held that it was unnecessary to justify the impost as a tax or fee under other entries, and that the contribution could still be sustained even if viewed as a fee. The absence of immediate contemporaneous benefit did not negate quid pro quo, because the scheme contemplated phased implementation and the fund was being built for eventual insurance benefits and medical services. The challenge to its validity was rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether Chapter V-A of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, imposing special contribution on employers during the transitory period, was ultra vires on the ground that it was a fee lacking quid pro quo.

Analysis: The special contribution formed part of a social welfare scheme enacted under the constitutional field of social security and labour welfare. The levy was sustained as being directly referable to the legislative competence under Entries 23 and 24 of List III, and it was unnecessary to justify it as a tax or fee under the residuary or fee-levying entries. Even if treated as a fee, the absence of immediate contemporaneous benefit did not invalidate it, because the scheme was designed for phased implementation and the benefits were to accrue in due course. The delayed or deferred character of the return did not negate the existence of quid pro quo, since the fund was being built for the eventual provision of insurance benefits and related medical services.

Conclusion: The levy under Chapter V-A was constitutionally valid and not ultra vires. The contention that the contribution was illegal for want of immediate quid pro quo was rejected.

---