TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a tenant whose defence against delivery of possession is struck out under section 17 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 can still cross-examine the plaintiff's witnesses and address arguments, and if so, to what extent.
Analysis: The striking out of defence is a penal provision and must be construed strictly. It deprives the tenant of the right to lead evidence in support of his own case, but it does not necessarily eliminate all participation in the suit. The plaintiff must still prove entitlement to a decree, and cross-examination of the plaintiff's witnesses is part of testing the plaintiff's evidence rather than the presentation of the defendant's own case. The Court also relied on analogous procedural principles under the Code of Civil Procedure and prior rent-control decisions to hold that the defendant's limited participation may be permitted so long as the plaintiff is not taken by surprise or prejudiced. However, this latitude is subject to safeguards: the defendant cannot adduce evidence of his own, and cross-examination must remain confined to exposing falsity or weakness in the plaintiff's case without becoming a disguised defence on merits.
Conclusion: Even after the defence is struck out under section 17 of the Act, the tenant is generally entitled, subject to judicial discretion and safeguards, to cross-examine the plaintiff's witnesses and address arguments on the plaintiff's case, but not to lead evidence of his own.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was allowed and the suit was restored for trial on the basis that a struck-out tenant's defence does not wholly exclude limited participation in the proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi: An order striking out the defence in a rent-control eviction suit bars the defendant from proving his own case, but does not, as a rule, prevent limited cross-examination and argument directed only to testing the plaintiff's proof, subject to the court's discretion to prevent prejudice and abuse.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
