TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether sale of imported goods from a private bonded warehouse to license holders is a sale in the course of import under section 5(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 read with section 2(ab) of that Act; (ii) Whether ex-bond sales of imported goods to duty free shops are sales in the course of import or export and therefore exempt; (iii) Whether the applicant is liable to discharge tax on the transactions under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002.
Issue (i): Whether sale of imported goods from a private bonded warehouse to license holders is a sale in the course of import under section 5(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 read with section 2(ab) of that Act.
Analysis: The statutory expression "crossing the customs frontier" was held to mean crossing the limits of the customs station in which imported goods are ordinarily kept before clearance by customs authorities. The reasoning distinguished customs station from customs area and customs barrier, and held that warehousing arrangements under the Customs Act, 1962 do not alter the CST Act test. Since the warehouse in question was a private warehouse under section 9 of the Customs Act, 1962 and not a customs station under section 7 of that Act, transfer from such warehouse did not occur before crossing the customs frontier for purposes of section 5(2).
Conclusion: The sale from the private bonded warehouse to license holders is not a sale in the course of import and is taxable.
Issue (ii): Whether ex-bond sales of imported goods to duty free shops are sales in the course of import or export and therefore exempt.
Analysis: The transaction was held not to satisfy the import test because the bonded warehouse was not a customs station within the meaning of section 2(ab) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. It was also held not to be export because the goods did not have a foreign destination in the legal sense required for export. The duty free shop rationale was distinguished on the facts and the sale was treated as an ordinary local sale under the State taxing law.
Conclusion: The ex-bond sale to the duty free shop is neither a sale in the course of import nor an export sale, and is taxable.
Issue (iii): Whether the applicant is liable to discharge tax on the transactions under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002.
Analysis: Section 6 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 was applied as the charging provision to sales of goods specified in the schedules. Once the transactions were held not to fall within the import exemption under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, they remained local sales exigible to tax under the relevant schedule entry.
Conclusion: The applicant is liable to discharge tax under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002.
Final Conclusion: The ruling holds that sales from the private bonded warehouse and the alleged duty free shop sales do not qualify as sales in the course of import, and the transactions are chargeable to tax under the State value added tax law.
Ratio Decidendi: For section 5(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, the relevant cut-off is crossing of the customs station contemplated by section 2(ab), and warehousing under the Customs Act, 1962 does not convert a private warehouse into a customs station or extend the import exemption to sales made from such warehouse.
TaxTMI 
