Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2012 (3) TMI 621 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal decision: Revenue's appeal dismissed, assessee partially allowed. Recomputation ordered. Genuineness established for RIB Bonds. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and partially allowed the assessee's appeal. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the loss ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                          Tribunal decision: Revenue's appeal dismissed, assessee partially allowed. Recomputation ordered. Genuineness established for RIB Bonds.

                          The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and partially allowed the assessee's appeal. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the loss from truck plying, restrict the disallowance of vehicle running expenses to 1/3rd, and allow the claim of depreciation in full as per law. The addition made under section 68 for the gift received in the form of RIB Bonds was deleted, as the genuineness of the transaction was established. The addition for the credit in the name of M/s. Ranjeet Securities Limited was also deleted.




                          Issues Involved:

                          1. Disallowance of Truck Plying Loss
                          2. Disallowance of Business Expenses
                          3. Addition u/s 68 for Gift Received in the Form of RIB Bonds
                          4. Addition u/s 68 for Credit in the Name of M/s. Ranjeet Securities Limited

                          Summary:

                          1. Disallowance of Truck Plying Loss:

                          The assessee contested the disallowance of Rs. 2,45,191/- on truck plying loss. The Tribunal found that the assessee was engaged in the business of truck plying and had maintained books of account. The major expenditure claimed was depreciation amounting to Rs. 2,60,454/- and truck running expenditure of Rs. 1,06,265/-, while earnings from the truck were Rs. 1,65,575/-. The Assessing Officer had declined to accept the loss due to the absence of books of account. However, it was established that the assessee had maintained books of account. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to restrict disallowance of vehicle running expenses to 1/3rd and to allow the claim of depreciation in full as per law, thereby recomputing the loss from truck plying accordingly.

                          2. Disallowance of Business Expenses:

                          The assessee also contested the disallowance of telephone expenses, vehicle running and maintenance expenses, and traveling expenses. The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer had disallowed these expenses on the basis that the assessee did not maintain any call register or other mechanisms to control telephone expenses. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to restrict the disallowance of vehicle running expenses to 1/3rd and to allow the claim of depreciation in full as per law.

                          3. Addition u/s 68 for Gift Received in the Form of RIB Bonds:

                          The Revenue contested the deletion of an addition of Rs. 13,39,252/- made u/s 68 in respect of a gift received by the assessee in the form of Resurgent India Bonds (RIB) from an NRI. The Assessing Officer had disbelieved the genuineness of the gift transaction, citing lack of relationship and documentary evidence to prove love and affection with the donor. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, establishing the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of the donor through various documents, including an affidavit and passport. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the findings were not controverted by the Revenue with any positive material on record.

                          4. Addition u/s 68 for Credit in the Name of M/s. Ranjeet Securities Limited:

                          The Revenue also contested the deletion of an addition made u/s 68 in respect of the credit shown in the name of M/s. Ranjeet Securities Limited. The Tribunal did not provide specific details on this issue in the summary provided, but it can be inferred that the CIT(A) had directed to delete the addition, and the Tribunal upheld this decision as well.

                          Conclusion:

                          The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed in part. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the loss from truck plying and to restrict the disallowance of vehicle running expenses while allowing the claim of depreciation in full as per law.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found