Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether potato chips are classifiable under entry 107 of Schedule IV as processed or preserved vegetables and not under the residuary schedule, and whether the consequential levy of tax, interest and penalty could be sustained.
Analysis: Potato chips were held to be produced from potato, a vegetable, and the processing by slicing, frying and seasoning did not alter the essential character of the commodity. The specific entry for processed or preserved vegetables was construed in the light of common parlance, the principle that a specific tariff entry prevails over a residuary entry, and the supportive understanding of the product in comparable State VAT and excise classifications. The Court also relied upon the view that contemporaneous administrative understanding and persuasive decisions from other High Courts supported the classification as a processed vegetable. Once the product was found to fall within the specific entry, resort to the residuary schedule was impermissible, and the consequential demand of higher tax, interest and penalty could not survive.
Conclusion: Potato chips were held classifiable under entry 107 of Schedule IV as processed vegetables, not under the residuary schedule, and the levy of differential tax, interest and penalty was unsustainable.