TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Allahabad HC: Clubbing turnover for SSI exemption requires notice to all units. Common ownership not enough.</h1> <h3>Commissioner Of Central Excise Noida-I Versus Shri B.M. Garg</h3> The Allahabad HC dismissed the appeal on clubbing turnover of six units for SSI exemption. Notices to all units are crucial for clubbing, and common ... SSI Exemption - clubbing of clearances - Why the turnover will not include the turnover of six units as six different units were established for the purpose of SSI exemption and that all the six units were owned and controlled by one person, namely, Sri B.M.Garg? - Held that:- All the units are located at different places and the mere fact that the units are owned and controlled by one person does not allow clubbing of the clearances - Merely because the proprietor of the present concern has interest in other six units does not entitle the Department to club all the shares of the assessee in other units - appeal dismissed - decided against Revenue. The Allahabad High Court dismissed the appeal regarding the clubbing of turnover of six units for SSI exemption, stating that notices to all units are essential for clubbing and ownership by one person does not automatically allow clubbing. The Tribunal's decision was upheld as no manifest error was found.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
