Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Invalid Assessments under Income Tax Act: Section 153A Limitation</h1> <h3>Rajiv Kumar Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1 Chandigarh,</h3> Rajiv Kumar Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1 Chandigarh, - [2017] 186 TTJ 522 Issues involved:- Validity of assessment framed under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act.- Jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer in framing assessment under Section 153A.- Compliance with provisions of Section 153A for assessment years preceding the search year.- Applicability of assessment under Section 143(3) versus Section 153A.- Interpretation of search year and relevant assessment year for framing assessments.Issue 1: Validity of assessment under Section 153A:The judgment addresses the challenge to the validity of assessments made under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act. The search and seizure operation conducted under Section 132(1) covered the assessee, leading to the issuance of a notice under Section 153A. The assessee contended that the assessment for the relevant year was against the Act's provisions, arguing that assessments under Section 153A could only be initiated for the six years preceding the search year. The CIT(A) upheld the assessment, noting that the AO mentioned both Section 153A and Section 143(3) in the order. However, the Tribunal disagreed, emphasizing that the assessment order explicitly stated it was framed under Section 153A. Citing relevant case laws, the Tribunal concluded that the assessment for the year under consideration was invalid under Section 153A, as it could only be framed for the six preceding assessment years, not the year following the search year.Issue 2: Jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer under Section 153A:The judgment delves into the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction in framing assessments under Section 153A. It highlights that the search conducted on the assessee led to the issuance of a notice under Section 153A, resulting in the assessment for the relevant year. The Tribunal analyzed the provisions of Section 153A, emphasizing that assessments under this section could be made for the six assessment years preceding the search year. The Tribunal concluded that the assessment for the year in question, framed under Section 153A, was invalid as it exceeded the statutory limit of preceding assessment years allowed under Section 153A.Issue 3: Compliance with Section 153A provisions for preceding assessment years:The judgment scrutinizes the compliance with Section 153A provisions regarding the assessment years preceding the search year. It notes that assessments under Section 153A can be initiated for the six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the search period. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessment year following the search year was not eligible for assessment under Section 153A, as it did not fall within the statutory provision's scope. This analysis led to the conclusion that the assessments under Section 153A for the relevant years were invalid and void ab initio.Issue 4: Applicability of assessment under Section 143(3) versus Section 153A:The judgment compares the applicability of assessments under Section 143(3) and Section 153A of the Income Tax Act. It clarifies that the assessment order explicitly stated it was framed under Section 153A, despite mentioning Section 143(3). The Tribunal emphasized that the AO's mention of Section 153A in the assessment order dictated the assessment's nature. This distinction was crucial in determining the validity of the assessments under Section 153A for the relevant years.Issue 5: Interpretation of search year and relevant assessment year for assessments:The judgment interprets the search year and the relevant assessment year for framing assessments under Section 153A. It underscores that assessments under Section 153A can only be made for the six assessment years preceding the search year. By analyzing the statutory provisions, the Tribunal concluded that the assessments for the year following the search year were beyond the scope of Section 153A, rendering them invalid. This interpretation guided the decision to quash the assessments under Section 153A for the relevant years.This detailed analysis of the judgment comprehensively covers the issues involved, providing a nuanced understanding of the legal intricacies and the Tribunal's decision regarding the validity of assessments under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found