Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether salaries paid outside India to expatriate employees were deductible in computing business income when tax deductible at source was deposited later, and whether the absence of entries in the profit and loss account barred the claim.
Analysis: Section 40(a)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as it stood for the relevant years, disallowed deduction only where salaries payable outside India had not been paid or deducted under Chapter XVII-B. The tax in question had in fact been deposited under Section 192 pursuant to the CBDT circular, and the Revenue had received the full amount with interest. The later deposit satisfied the statutory condition, and the absence of any express requirement that TDS must be deposited within the prescribed time could not be read into the provision. The omission of a proviso similar to Section 40(a)(i) did not justify a stricter rule for salaries. The failure to reflect the expenditure in the profit and loss account also did not defeat an otherwise allowable deduction, since entitlement depends on law and not on accounting entries.
Conclusion: The deduction was allowable and the objection under Section 40(a)(iii) failed; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded, and the assessee was held entitled to the deduction claimed for the relevant salary payments.
Ratio Decidendi: Where tax deductible at source on salaries payable outside India is ultimately deposited under Chapter XVII-B, Section 40(a)(iii) does not impose an additional requirement of deposit within time unless the statute expressly says so, and accounting omission does not control the allowability of the deduction.