Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned tax and penalty order was liable to be set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration on the ground that adequate opportunity of hearing was not granted.
Analysis: The assessment proceedings were challenged on the footing that the assessee had sought time to file objections and requested a personal hearing, but the order was passed without granting the extension sought and without effectively considering the further objections. The dispute concerned levy under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, including the treatment of the transaction and the imposition of penalty. In these circumstances, the requirement of fair hearing and observance of natural justice assumed importance, and the matter called for reconsideration by the assessing authority after giving the assessee an effective opportunity to present its case and supporting materials.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted to the assessing authority for fresh orders after providing an opportunity of personal hearing and considering the assessee's objections. The relief was thus granted in favour of the assessee to that extent.