Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty was sustainable when the assessee had informed the department of clearance of prototype vehicles, claimed exemption bona fide, and paid the duty and interest before issuance of the show-cause notice.
Analysis: The assessee had disclosed the clearances from the beginning and had sought the benefit of the exemption notification. After the department declined the exemption, duty was paid before the show-cause notice, and the record did not disclose any mala fide intention, suppression of facts, or misdeclaration. In these circumstances, the case was confined to differential duty, already discharged, and the basis for imposing penalty was not made out.
Conclusion: Penalty was not leviable and the order setting aside the penalty was upheld.