Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether routers and switches used in the assessee's network setup constituted part of a computer so as to qualify for depreciation at 60% under the income-tax depreciation schedule.
Analysis: Depreciation under section 32 is governed by the prescribed rates in the rules and appendix. The term "computer" was not defined in the Act for the relevant provision, and the special definition of "computer system" in section 36(1)(xi) was held to be confined to that clause and not transferable to section 32. The definition in the Information Technology Act, 2000 was also not treated as controlling for income-tax purposes, though it was considered as a guide. Applying common parlance and commercial parlance principles, the function, use, and character of routers and switches were examined. Since they facilitate transmission and routing of data and do not themselves perform the logical, arithmetic, and memory functions of a computer, they are not automatically outside the concept of computer equipment; where such devices operate as integral components of the computer system, they form part of the computer.
Conclusion: Routers and switches, on the facts of the case, were held to be integral parts of the computer and were eligible for depreciation at 60%, in favour of the assessee.