TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal partially allowed, routers and switches qualify for higher depreciation rate.</h1> The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, ruling in favor of the assessee on the depreciation issue. It held that routers and switches qualify as part of a ... Depreciation on routers and switches - at the rate of 15% OR 60% - Held that:- No doubt the function of the computer, as one composite unit, is to perform logical, arithmetical or memory functions etc., but it is not only the equipment which performs such functions that can be called as computer; All the input and output devices, as discussed which support in the receipt of input and outflow of the output are also part of computer. CPU alone, cannot be considered as synonymous to the expression 'Computer'. The function of CPU is akin to the brain playing a pivotal role in the conduct of the body. As do not call the brain alone as the body, similarly the CPU alone cannot be described as computer. Thus the computer has to necessarily include the input and output devices within its scope, subject to their exclusive user with the computer, as discussed above. If construct the definition of computer only to processing unit, as has been held in the case of Routermania Technologies (P.) Ltd. (2007 (4) TMI 389 - ITAT MUMBAI ), then even the keyboard and mouse etc., will not qualify to be called as computer because these equipments also do not perform logical, arithmetical or memory functions. In the light of the meaning of 'computer' discussed in earlier paras, we are inclined to agree with the view taken by the Kolkata Bench in Samiran Majumdar's case (2005 (8) TMI 293 - ITAT CALCUTTA-B ). Therefore, hold that the routers and switches in the circumstances of the case, are integral part of Computer, entitled to depreciation at the rate of 60 per cent. - Decided in favour of assessee Issues Involved:1. Depreciation rate on routers and switches.2. Disallowance of payment towards purchase and freight charges.Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:1. Depreciation Rate on Routers and Switches:The primary issue pertains to whether routers and switches qualify as part of a computer for the purposes of depreciation under Section 32 of the Income-tax Act. The assessee claimed depreciation at the rate of 60% on routers and switches, arguing that these accessories form an integral part of computers. However, the Assessing Officer allowed depreciation at the rate of 15%, leading to a disallowance of Rs. 26,68,482/-.The Tribunal examined the definition and common parlance understanding of 'computer.' It noted that the term 'computer' is not defined in the Income-tax Act, and thus, its meaning must be derived from common usage and commercial parlance. The Tribunal referred to various case laws and definitions, including those from the Information Technology Act, 2000, and concluded that a computer includes all input and output devices that support its functioning.The Tribunal further analyzed the functions of routers and switches, noting that these devices facilitate data flow and connectivity between computers, making them integral to the computer system. The Tribunal held that routers and switches are part of the computer hardware when used exclusively with computers, thus qualifying for a higher depreciation rate of 60%.2. Disallowance of Payment Towards Purchase and Freight Charges:The second issue involved the disallowance of Rs. 4,88,052/- towards purchase and freight charges as per the report in Form No. 3CEB under Section 92E of the Act. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) noted that this ground was not pressed by the assessee despite written submissions being made.The Tribunal remanded this issue back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for a fresh analysis. It directed that the assessee be given an opportunity to present evidence and be heard, ensuring a fair reassessment of the factual matrix.Conclusion:The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on the issue of depreciation, allowing a 60% rate for routers and switches. The issue of disallowance of payment towards purchase and freight charges was remanded back for further examination.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
