Tribunal rejects assessee's plea for rectification of mistakes in deduction orders

The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Applications filed by the assessee seeking rectification of alleged mistakes in the orders related to deductions under sections 80IC and 14A. The Tribunal found no errors in its original orders and concluded that the issues raised by the assessee had been adequately addressed and decided upon previously.

---

---

Issues:
1. Rectification of mistakes alleged in the order of the Tribunal dated 12.09.2014 passed in ITA Nos. 1339/KOL/2012 and 1144/KOL/2012.
2. Alleged mistake in the order of the Tribunal regarding deduction under section 80IC.
3. Alleged mistake in the order of the Tribunal regarding disallowance made under section 14A read with Rule 8D.

Issue 1:
The assessee sought rectification of three alleged mistakes in the Tribunal's order. The first mistake regarding the claim for deduction under section 80-IA was not pressed by the assessee during the hearing. The second mistake involved the disallowance of the deduction under section 80IC. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim based on the notional profit not being included in the Profit & Loss Account. The Tribunal directed the CIT(Appeals) to verify if the income from the eligible undertaking was included in the gross total income. The Tribunal found no mistake in this direction as the issue arose from the Assessing Officer's order. The third mistake related to the disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D.

Issue 2:
Regarding the alleged mistake in the order of the Tribunal concerning the deduction under section 80IC, the Tribunal found no error in directing the CIT(Appeals) to verify if the profit from the eligible undertaking was included in the gross total income. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim based on the notional profit not being included in the Profit & Loss Account. The Tribunal held that the issue arose from the Assessing Officer's order, and the direction given was appropriate.

Issue 3:
Concerning the alleged mistake in the order of the Tribunal regarding the disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D, the assessee claimed that the Tribunal did not allow further arguments on the absence of objective satisfaction by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal, however, found that the satisfaction was recorded objectively by the Assessing Officer. The assessee's representative filed an affidavit claiming otherwise. The Tribunal dismissed the claim of a mistake as there was no evidence to support the claim that the Tribunal did not allow further arguments on the issue. The Tribunal had discussed and decided on the satisfaction required for disallowance under section 14A.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Applications filed by the assessee as there were no apparent mistakes in the orders regarding the deductions under sections 80IC and 14A. The Tribunal found that the issues raised by the assessee were adequately addressed and decided upon in the original orders.

---