Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent had commenced commercial production on or before 31.3.2010 so as to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-CE dated 10.6.03.
Analysis: The notification was linked to the industrial policy and the governing test was the date of commencement of commercial production, not the existence of fully saleable finished goods or completed sales by the cut-off date. The State authorities had certified commencement of commercial production as 31.3.2010, and the respondent had also been extended similar benefit under other fiscal regimes on the same factual basis. The Revenue's objections regarding incomplete plant installation, power supply, raw material, and alleged manipulation were considered, but the record contained direct and corroborative material relied upon by the original authority. The absence of commercial sales before 31.3.2010 did not displace the finding that commercial production had begun by that date.
Conclusion: The respondent was eligible for the exemption, and the Revenue failed to establish any ground for interference.
Ratio Decidendi: For an area-based exemption tied to commencement of commercial production, the decisive requirement is actual commencement of commercial production by the cut-off date, and not prior sale of fully marketable finished goods.