TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Invalid Reassessment under Income-tax Act: Importance of New Information</h1> The High Court held that the reassessment u/s 147(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was invalid as it was based on reconsideration of existing facts ... Information, Reassessment Issues Involved:1. Validity of reassessment u/s 147(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. Legality of initiating action u/s 147(b) when the original assessment was under appeal.Summary:Issue 1: Validity of reassessment u/s 147(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961The Tribunal referred two questions of law regarding the reassessment of a registered firm deriving income from film exhibition for the assessment year 1973-74. The Income-tax Officer (ITO) initially assessed the income at Rs. 1,24,461, which was later appealed and allowed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. Post-assessment, audit objections were raised concerning expenses on gratuity, bonus, performance tax, repairs, and maintenance. The ITO, after further enquiries, initiated reassessment proceedings u/s 147(b) and issued a notice u/s 148, leading to a revised total income of Rs. 1,63,357. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) annulled the reassessment, citing that the ITO's action was based on audit objections and not new information, referencing the Supreme Court decision in Indian and Eastern Newspaper Society v. CIT [1979] 119 ITR 996 (SC). The Tribunal, however, upheld the reassessment, stating that the ITO had reason to believe there was an escapement of income. The High Court, upon review, found that the ITO's reassessment was based on reconsideration of existing facts influenced by audit objections, not new information, and thus invalid u/s 147(b). The Court emphasized that the ITO's satisfaction must be based on new information, not merely a change of opinion or directions from the Commissioner.Issue 2: Legality of initiating action u/s 147(b) when the original assessment was under appealGiven the negative answer to the first question, the High Court found it unnecessary to address the second issue regarding the legality of initiating action u/s 147(b) while the original assessment was under appeal. The reference was answered accordingly, with parties bearing their own costs.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
