TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition in the case.</h1> <h3>Centrica India Offshore (P.) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Income-tax-I, New Delhi</h3> The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition in the case. - Centrica India Offshore (P.) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Income-tax-I, New Delhi - ... Apex Court dismissed the appeal of the assessee wherein HC has decided the issue against the assessee i.e Whether the secondment of employees by BSTL and DEML, the overseas entities, falls within Article 12 of the India-Canada and Article 13 of the India-UK DTAAs – High Court in this case [2014 (5) TMI 154 - DELHI HIGH COURT] had uphold the order of AAR and observed that, The nomenclature or lesser-than-expected amount charged for such services cannot change the nature of the services - once it is established that there was a provision of services, the payment made may indeed be payment for services - which may be deducted in accordance with law - or reimbursement for costs incurred – thus, the ruling of AAR is upheld – Decided against Assessee. The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition in the case with citation 2015 (12) TMI 912 - SC. Judges Madan B. Lokur and C. Nagappan presided over the case. Petitioner represented by S. Ganesh, Nageswar Rao, Sandeep Karhail, Ms. Sayaree Basu Mallik, and Ambhoj Kumar Sinha.
TaxTMI 
