Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2015 (12) TMI 707 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tax Tribunal Upholds Commissioner's Action on Section 263, Excludes Items from Deduction Calculation The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax's action under Section 263, finding the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to revenue due to ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tax Tribunal Upholds Commissioner's Action on Section 263, Excludes Items from Deduction Calculation

                            The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax's action under Section 263, finding the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to revenue due to inclusion of items not eligible for deduction under Section 80IB. The Tribunal agreed with the exclusion of duty drawback and interest income from the deduction calculation, citing a Supreme Court decision. It held that the CIT's jurisdiction under Section 263 was valid despite the issue merging with the CIT(A) order, as the latter did not consider the Supreme Court's interpretation. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, affirming the CIT's actions and disallowing the deduction on duty drawback and interest income.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Validity of the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) taking cognizance under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
                            2. Admissibility of deduction under Section 80IB on duty drawback and interest income.
                            3. Impact of subsequent Supreme Court decisions on previously settled assessments.
                            4. Jurisdiction of CIT under Section 263 when the issue has merged with the order of the CIT(A).

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Validity of CIT Taking Cognizance Under Section 263:
                            The primary grievance of the assessee was that the CIT erred in taking cognizance under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act and revising the assessment order dated 26.12.2008. The CIT believed that the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, as it included items (duty drawback and interest income) not eligible for deduction under Section 80IB. The Tribunal upheld the CIT's action, noting that the CIT must record satisfaction that the order of the AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. The Tribunal emphasized that the CIT's power under Section 263 includes examining records and forming an opinion that the AO's order is erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue, and then issuing a show cause notice to the assessee.

                            2. Admissibility of Deduction Under Section 80IB:
                            The assessee claimed a deduction under Section 80IB, including duty drawback and interest income. The CIT held that these items were not derived from the industrial undertaking and thus not eligible for deduction under Section 80IB. The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Liberty India Vs. CIT, which clarified that duty drawback and DEPB do not qualify as profits derived from industrial undertakings. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT's exclusion of these items from the deduction calculation.

                            3. Impact of Subsequent Supreme Court Decisions:
                            The Tribunal addressed the assessee's argument that the AO's decision, based on the prevailing jurisdictional High Court ruling, should not be considered erroneous due to a subsequent Supreme Court decision. The Tribunal rejected this argument, stating that the Supreme Court's interpretation of a statute is a declaration of what the law has always been. Therefore, the AO's order, which included duty drawback in the Section 80IB deduction, was erroneous as per the Supreme Court's interpretation.

                            4. Jurisdiction of CIT Under Section 263:
                            The assessee argued that the issue had merged with the order of the CIT(A), and thus the CIT could not take cognizance under Section 263. The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) had decided the appeal before the Supreme Court's decision in Liberty India, and therefore, the CIT(A) did not consider the issue in light of the Supreme Court's interpretation. The Tribunal held that the CIT could exercise jurisdiction under Section 263 to correct the assessment order in accordance with the Supreme Court's decision.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal dismissed both appeals of the assessee, upholding the CIT's action under Section 263 and confirming the disallowance of the deduction under Section 80IB on duty drawback and interest income. The Tribunal emphasized that the CIT's revision powers were correctly exercised, and the subsequent Supreme Court decision justified the revision of the assessment order.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found