Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court affirms interest entitlement on refund amount under Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954</h1> <h3>Commercial Taxes Officer, Jaipur Versus Shree Containers Pvt. Ltd.</h3> The court upheld the petitioner's entitlement to interest on the refund amount under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954, at a rate of 15 per cent per annum ... Claim of interest for delayed Refund - revenue contended that in the case at hand no excess deposit of tax was made by the assessee, but he was held entitled to a refund by the assessing officer only on account of the benefit of set-off. - Held that:- Section 23(2) of the Act of 1954 entitles an assessee to refund of excess tax paid to the Department along with interest at 15 per cent from the date of excess amounts obtain with the Department till date of payment. It is obvious that the section in issue incorporates a principle of equity. Money only has time value, i.e., the value is diluted with time. Interest compensates for dilution of money value. If the contention of the OIC were to be upheld, the assessee's entitlement to refund for reasons of set-off he would be made to bleed with passage of time and be left with no recourse. Such an interpretation would also confer arbitrary powers in the hands of the Department to hold back without limit money due to an assessee as refund. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to narrowly read section 23(2) to exclude payment of interest at the rate prescribed thereunder on excess tax in deposit with the Department arrived at by the assessing office for reason of the assessee's right to set-off and which amount was admittedly found refundable to the assessee. - There is no illegality or perversity in the impugned order passed by the tax Board. - Decided against Revenue. Issues:1. Entitlement to interest on refund amount under Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954.Analysis:The case involved a revision petition challenging an order passed by the Rajasthan Tax Board regarding the entitlement of interest on a refund amount under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954. The petitioner, engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling tin containers and mustard oil, was directed by the assessing officer to be refunded an amount resulting from the right of set off of tax. The petitioner appealed before the Board seeking interest at the rate of 15 per cent on the refund amount. The Board, in its order dated March 23, 1998, allowed the petitioner's claim for interest at the rate of 15 per cent from the date the amount became due till the date of payment.Upon hearing the officer in-charge and examining the impugned order, the court considered the submission challenging the payment of interest at the rate of 15 per cent on the refund amount. The officer in-charge contended that the decision to pay interest was not within the scope of section 23(2) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954. However, the court referred to section 23 of the Act, which provides for refunds to dealers along with interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from the date of deposit of the amount to be refunded.The court analyzed that section 23(2) of the Act entitles an assessee to a refund of excess tax paid along with interest at 15 per cent from the date of deposit till the date of payment. It emphasized that interest compensates for the dilution of money value over time and ensures equity in financial transactions. Upholding the petitioner's entitlement to interest on the refund amount, the court rejected the officer's contention that such entitlement was not valid in cases of refunds due to set-off benefits. The court concluded that denying interest on refund amounts due to set-off would unfairly disadvantage the assessee and give arbitrary powers to the Department to withhold refunds indefinitely.In light of the above analysis, the court found no merit in the officer's submission challenging the order of the Tax Board dated March 23, 1998. It held that there was no illegality or perversity in the impugned order and dismissed the revision petition, affirming the entitlement of the petitioner to interest on the refund amount as per the provisions of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found