Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether imported parts used in hydraulic systems manufactured for windmills were eligible for exemption from additional customs duty under List 8, Sl. No. 13 of Notification No. 12/12-CE dated 17.03.2012; (ii) whether relief could be sustained under the alternative entry in Sl. No. 21 of the same List.
Issue (i): Whether imported parts used in hydraulic systems manufactured for windmills were eligible for exemption from additional customs duty under List 8, Sl. No. 13 of Notification No. 12/12-CE dated 17.03.2012.
Analysis: The imported goods were used in hydraulic systems meant exclusively for windmills. The entry in Sl. No. 13 covered wind operated electricity generators, including their components and parts, and the exemption extended not only to complete systems but also to components and parts thereof. On the record, there was nothing to show that the imported parts were used for any purpose other than in windmill-related hydraulic systems. The goods therefore fell within the basic exemption entry for non-conventional energy devices or systems.
Conclusion: The exemption under Sl. No. 13 applied, and the demand of additional customs duty was not sustainable.
Issue (ii): Whether relief could be sustained under the alternative entry in Sl. No. 21 of the same List.
Analysis: Once the goods were found to be covered by the primary exemption entry in Sl. No. 13, it was unnecessary to examine the alternative basis under Sl. No. 21.
Conclusion: The alternative entry did not require adjudication and was not to the outcome.
Final Conclusion: The imported parts were treated as covered by the principal exemption entry for windmill-related systems, and the Revenue's appeals were rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a notification exempts a system and its components and parts, imported parts used exclusively in manufacture of such exempt windmill-related systems are entitled to the exemption on the principal entry itself.