Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court rules exclusion of cigarettes from taxable turnover calculation for levy of exemption/composition fee under Sales Tax Act.</h1> <h3>Commercial Taxes Officer, Circle Kishangarh, Ajmer Versus Krishna Trading Company</h3> The court upheld the exclusion of cigarettes and tobacco products from the taxable turnover calculation for the levy of exemption/composition fee under ... Whether for levy of exemption fee/composition fee in lieu of turnover tax under the extent Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994, exempted goods notified by the State of Rajasthan under the Notification No. F.4(11) FD Group-4/95-86 dated March 27, 1995, i.e., cigarette and products of tobacco could be reckoned for computation of turnover tax - Held that:- section 13A(2)(i) makes it amply evident that the taxable turnover shall not include the sale and purchase of exempted goods. Admittedly consequent to additional duty of excise under the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 vide notification dated March 27, 1995 by the State Government had declared cigarettes and products of tobacco exempted from purchase and sales tax under the Act of 1994. In these circumstances the sale of the respondent/assessee to the extent of ₹ 33,60,806 from its business in cigarette and products of tobacco could not have been reckoned for determination of taxable turnover and levy of exemption/composition fee in lieu thereof. The findings of the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) as upheld by the Tax Board, are valid and legal. I find nothing perverse therein. No question of law as sought to be agitated in this revision petition is made out. In fact the revision petition has been mechanically filed as is evident from the generality of grounds agitated in support of the petition - Decided against Revenue. Issues:1. Interpretation of exemption fee/composition fee under Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994.2. Reckoning exempted goods for computation of turnover tax.3. Validity of assessing officer's levy of composition fee.4. Exclusion of sale/purchase of cigarettes for determination of taxable turnover.5. Compliance with statutory provisions and notifications for levy of tax/exemption fee.Analysis:1. The main issue in this case was the interpretation of exemption fee/composition fee under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994. The court examined whether exempted goods like cigarettes and products of tobacco, as notified by the State of Rajasthan, should be considered for the computation of turnover tax.2. The court analyzed the provision of section 13A(2)(i) of the Act of 1994, which specifies that the taxable turnover shall not include the sale and purchase of exempted goods. The State Government had exempted cigarettes and tobacco products from purchase and sales tax under a specific notification. Therefore, the sale of these exempted goods by the assessee could not be included in the determination of taxable turnover for the levy of exemption/composition fee.3. Another issue raised was the validity of the assessing officer's levy of a higher composition fee based on treating the assessee's turnover at a certain amount. The Tax Board found this levy to be illegal and set it aside, upholding the order of the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) for a lower composition fee.4. The court concluded that the exclusion of the sale/purchase of cigarettes from the taxable turnover calculation was in line with the statutory provisions and notifications issued by the State Government. The findings of the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tax Board were deemed valid and legal, with no perversity found in their decisions.5. The court dismissed the revision petition, noting that it lacked substance and was filed mechanically without critiquing the reasoning of the lower authorities. The petition failed to address the statutory provisions, government notifications, and earlier judgments relevant to the computation of taxable turnover for the levy of tax or exemption fee. The court emphasized the importance of complying with these legal aspects in tax matters.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found