Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal grants unconditional stay on Cenvat credit and duty demand, penalties</h1> <h3>M/s Ganpati Rollings Pvt. Ltd. & Shri Sushil Kumar Jain Versus CCE, Delhi - I</h3> The Tribunal granted an unconditional stay on both the Cenvat credit demand and duty demand, along with associated penalties, in favor of the appellant ... Waiver of pre deposit - Duty demand - Denial of CENVAT Credit - Fraudulent credit - Bogus invoices - under reported the production of copper rods by inflating the power consumption - Held that:- Tribunal in respect of the case against M/s V.K. Metal Works has vide stay order has waived the requirement of pre-deposit of the duty demand, interest and penalty and had stayed its recovery by taking a prima facie view that the above-mentioned allegation against them by issuing bogus invoices for copper ingots without manufacturing any activity prima facie is not sustainable. - appellant have prima facie case in respect of the Cenvat credit demand of ₹ 5,50,50,489/- and hence in respect of this Cenvat credit demand unconditional stay has to be granted. Appellant had given the reasons for this fluctuation and according to them this fluctuation is due to power break down or fluctuation in electric voltage resulting in breakdown of manufacturing process resulting in cooling of furnace which requires more consumption of power for re-heating. Prima facie, we find that these factors have not been considered and the Commissioner has arbitrarily adopted the power consumption figure of 346 units per MT as the norm for the entire period. In our prima facie view estimating production on this basis would not be correct when there is absolutely no evidence of unaccounted purchase of raw material. - Stay granted. Issues:1. Allegation of taking Cenvat credit based on bogus invoices.2. Allegation of underreporting production by inflating power consumption.Analysis:1. The appellant company was accused of taking Cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 5,50,50,489 based on alleged bogus invoices of copper ingots from M/s V.K. Metal Works, Jammu. The Commissioner confirmed this demand along with penalties. The appellant argued that the same allegation against M/s V.K. Metal Works was not sustainable as per a Tribunal stay order, which also considered the existence of M/s Kanpur Kashmir Roadways. The Tribunal found a prima facie case in favor of the appellant and granted an unconditional stay on the Cenvat credit demand.2. The second allegation against the appellant was underreporting production by inflating power consumption, leading to a duty demand of Rs. 32,06,93,486. The Commissioner adopted a power consumption norm of 346 units per MT, disregarding fluctuations due to power breakdowns and voltage fluctuations. The appellant contended that this norm was arbitrary and did not consider valid reasons for power consumption variations. They cited legal precedents where allegations based solely on power consumption norms were deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant, finding that the duty demand was not sustainable due to lack of evidence of unaccounted raw material purchase and arbitrary adoption of power consumption figures. Therefore, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement for the duty demand, interest, and penalties, allowing a stay on recovery.In conclusion, the Tribunal granted an unconditional stay on both the Cenvat credit demand and duty demand, along with associated penalties, in favor of the appellant company and its director, based on the lack of sustainable evidence and arbitrary adoption of norms by the Commissioner.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found