Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods in question were classifiable as drugs and medicines under entry 21 of the Fourth Schedule to the Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003, or as cosmetics and toilet preparations taxable under entry 1 of the Fifth Schedule; and whether the Explanation to entry 21 excluded products that are primarily drugs and medicines but also capable of ancillary cosmetic use.
Analysis: Entry 21 covered drugs and medicines at the concessional rate, while the Explanation excluded only those products which are capable of being used as cosmetics, toilet preparations, toothpaste, tooth powder, toilet articles and soaps. The controlling tests were the primary use of the product, its common parlance understanding, and user perception. Applying those principles, the products before the Court were found to be essentially drugs and medicines, with only ancillary cosmetic or toilet use. The mere fact that they could also be used in a cosmetic manner did not take them out of entry 21, nor did the extent of medicinal ingredients by itself determine classification.
Conclusion: The impugned goods were classifiable under entry 21 of the Fourth Schedule and not under entry 1 of the Fifth Schedule; the classification orders and related directions taxing them at 12.5 per cent were set aside.