Cash pre-deposit in VAT stay proceedings may be replaced by bank guarantee where levy is substantially arguable.

A cash pre-deposit in stay proceedings may be moderated where the underlying levy itself is a substantial arguable issue and the assessee shows a strong prima facie case. The dispute concerned whether the petitioner's service activity involved a taxable transfer of goods, transfer of the right to use goods, or supply of goods attracting levy under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. Because the appeal should not be rendered illusory by an onerous immediate payment condition, security by way of a bank guarantee was treated as an appropriate alternative to protect revenue while the merits remain open in the pending appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the condition of cash pre-deposit imposed in stay proceedings was justified, and whether it should be replaced by a bank guarantee in view of the arguable question regarding applicability of the sales tax / VAT levy to the petitioner's service activity.

Analysis: The dispute centered on whether the petitioner's activity involved any taxable transfer of goods, transfer of the right to use goods, or supply of goods during the course of service, so as to attract the levy under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. The nature of the transaction required a proper segregation of the service element from any goods element, and the existence of an arguable issue with a strong prima facie case meant that the appellate remedy should not be burdened by an onerous cash deposit. In such a situation, the authorities were expected to balance equities by securing the revenue through a bank guarantee rather than insisting on immediate cash payment.

Conclusion: The condition of cash deposit was not sustained, and the petitioner was directed to furnish a bank guarantee instead; the stay application was disposed of on that basis.

Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded to the extent of modifying the stay condition, with the matter left open for decision on merits in the pending appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the levy itself raises a substantial arguable issue and the assessee has a strong prima facie case, a pre-deposit condition may be moderated by acceptance of security such as a bank guarantee so that the statutory appeal is not rendered illusory.

---