Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Trust's Loan Exemption Upheld, Depreciation Denied</h1> <h3>The Deputy Director of Income-Tax (Exemptions), Chennai Versus M/s Vels Institute of Science, Technology & Advanced Studies</h3> The Deputy Director of Income-Tax (Exemptions), Chennai Versus M/s Vels Institute of Science, Technology & Advanced Studies - TMI Issues Involved:1. Violation of Section 13(1)(c) r.w.s. 13(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. Eligibility for exemption under Section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.3. Receipt of donations from Sri Balaji Charitable and Educational Trust.4. Claim for depreciation under Section 32 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Detailed Analysis:1. Violation of Section 13(1)(c) r.w.s. 13(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961:The Revenue contended that the assessee-Trust, registered under Section 12AA, violated Section 13(1)(c) r.w.s. 13(3) by advancing a loan of Rs. 15,76,00,000 to its Managing Trustee, which was deemed as a misuse of trust funds. The Assessing Officer noted that the loan was given without adequate security, making the Trust ineligible for exemption under Section 11. The CIT(Appeals), however, allowed the assessee's claim on the ground that the loan was for purchasing land to establish a medical college, and the Managing Trustee repaid the amount with interest, thus not violating Section 13(1)(c).2. Eligibility for exemption under Section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961:The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals)' decision, confirming that the transaction was genuine and the money advanced was repaid with interest. The Tribunal emphasized that the market value of land is subjective and depends on various factors. Since the Managing Trustee repaid the loan with interest, the transaction did not constitute a diversion of funds. Therefore, the Trust did not violate Section 13(1)(c), and the exemption under Section 11 was rightly allowed.3. Receipt of donations from Sri Balaji Charitable and Educational Trust:The Revenue argued that the corpus of Rs. 37,83,27,838 received as donations from Sri Balaji Charitable and Educational Trust should be treated as income due to the violation of Section 13(1)(c). The Tribunal, however, found no evidence of fund diversion. The donation was in the form of capital assets (three institutions) for charitable purposes, and since there was no misuse of funds, the exemption under Section 11 was valid.4. Claim for depreciation under Section 32 of the Income-tax Act, 1961:The assessee-Trust claimed depreciation of Rs. 5,25,30,554. The Tribunal denied this claim, stating that as a charitable institution claiming exemption under Section 11, the Trust is not eligible for depreciation under Section 32. The Tribunal referenced a similar case (Tamil Nadu Cricket Association v. DDIT(Exemptions)) and reiterated that once the cost of capital expenditure is claimed as an exemption under Section 11, the written down value of the asset becomes NIL, and no further depreciation can be claimed.Conclusion:The Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross-objection, confirming the CIT(Appeals)' decision to allow the exemption under Section 11 but denying the claim for depreciation under Section 32. The order was pronounced on 28th October 2015 at Chennai.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found